Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42931 - 42940 of 68207 for law.

State v. Tamara Norwood-Thomas
constitute ineffective assistance is a mixed question of law and fact. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12932 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, applies a proper standard of law and, using a demonstrated rational process, reaches a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050906 - 2025-12-18

Robert S. O'Kon v. Frederick A. Laude
of Gonyo Law Office of Berlin. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the defendant-respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6984 - 2005-03-31

State v. Farrah E. Lott
for purposes of a suppression motion presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. O’Brien
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7096 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
¶4 Under Wisconsin law, TPR proceedings involve a two-part statutory procedure: the “grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296057 - 2020-10-14

[PDF] George Hechimovich v. Superior Services, Inc.
and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Summary judgment should be granted only where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13950 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jefferson County Department of Human Services v. Volonna W.
of Parental Rights Notice required by law.” During a post-trial evidentiary hearing, Volonna’s counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13212 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
case is a question of law that this court determines independently of the circuit court and court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=658222 - 2023-05-24

[PDF] Lisa Cervantes v. Andrew P. Fox
if it considered the relevant facts, properly interpreted and applied the law and reached a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6485 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Ron Guenther v. City of Onalaska
. Skemp and Sonja Davig Huesmann of William Skemp Law Firm, S.C. of La Crosse. On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13740 - 2014-09-15