Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42971 - 42980 of 83914 for case number.
Search results 42971 - 42980 of 83914 for case number.
State v. Arch L. H.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2311-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11256 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2311-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11256 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and the state. Plaintiffs’ second argument simply misreads cases to create a requirement not in the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31597 - 2014-09-15
and the state. Plaintiffs’ second argument simply misreads cases to create a requirement not in the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31597 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that she had testified in other cases as an expert where she had not conducted the autopsy but had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251187 - 2019-12-09
that she had testified in other cases as an expert where she had not conducted the autopsy but had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251187 - 2019-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial, alleging she received ineffective assistance of counsel. Keri also asserted Marissa’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49276 - 2010-04-22
for a new trial, alleging she received ineffective assistance of counsel. Keri also asserted Marissa’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49276 - 2010-04-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: 1 The small claims case was presided over by the Honorable Mary Kuhnmuench. No. 2013AP2183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118317 - 2014-09-15
: 1 The small claims case was presided over by the Honorable Mary Kuhnmuench. No. 2013AP2183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118317 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of § 895.52. For the reasons stated below, we conclude that § 895.52 applies in this case and grants Sundog
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138329 - 2015-03-25
of § 895.52. For the reasons stated below, we conclude that § 895.52 applies in this case and grants Sundog
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138329 - 2015-03-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The charges in this case began with a reported incident in which Mary2 described a domestic dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=870700 - 2024-11-05
The charges in this case began with a reported incident in which Mary2 described a domestic dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=870700 - 2024-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237747 - 2019-03-19
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237747 - 2019-03-19
2007 WI APP 166
2007 WI App 166 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1125 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29269 - 2007-07-24
2007 WI App 166 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1125 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29269 - 2007-07-24
2008 WI APP 96
2008 WI App 96 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP2061-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32841 - 2011-06-14
2008 WI App 96 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP2061-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32841 - 2011-06-14