Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 431 - 440 of 91282 for police arresting judge 2 part.
Search results 431 - 440 of 91282 for police arresting judge 2 part.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 4 ¶5 On August 20, 2009, the day police arrested him, Masarik was interviewed by two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175636 - 2017-09-21
-CR 4 ¶5 On August 20, 2009, the day police arrested him, Masarik was interviewed by two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175636 - 2017-09-21
State v. William T. Ackerman
, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2] An officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11637 - 2005-03-31
, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2] An officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11637 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith E. Pischke
was No. 95-0183-CR -2- made to a police officer and not to the prosecutor. We agree. And, as did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8536 - 2017-09-19
was No. 95-0183-CR -2- made to a police officer and not to the prosecutor. We agree. And, as did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8536 - 2017-09-19
State v. Paul E. Hnanicek
of an illegal arrest.[1] We affirm. I. Police arrested Hnanicek for violating a City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13762 - 2005-03-31
of an illegal arrest.[1] We affirm. I. Police arrested Hnanicek for violating a City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13762 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Kenosha v. Timothy M. Clark
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: ROBERT V. BAKER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9435 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: ROBERT V. BAKER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9435 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
arrest when there is reasonable suspicion that the car contains evidence of OWI. See id., ¶¶2, 50-51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=743290 - 2023-12-21
arrest when there is reasonable suspicion that the car contains evidence of OWI. See id., ¶¶2, 50-51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=743290 - 2023-12-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2023-24). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919511 - 2025-02-26
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2023-24). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919511 - 2025-02-26
State v. Larry J. Kain
to arrest him. We disagree and affirm the conviction. ¶2 The controlling facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6579 - 2005-03-31
to arrest him. We disagree and affirm the conviction. ¶2 The controlling facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6579 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2009-10). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73219 - 2014-09-15
. 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2009-10). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73219 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2015-16). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212272 - 2018-05-03
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2015-16). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212272 - 2018-05-03