Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4301 - 4310 of 68307 for did.
Search results 4301 - 4310 of 68307 for did.
State v. Damonta J. Jones
agreement. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in sentencing Jones, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18288 - 2005-05-31
agreement. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in sentencing Jones, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18288 - 2005-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
witnesses.” Lagrone said that he did read the form and that his attorney helped him understand what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139119 - 2015-04-06
witnesses.” Lagrone said that he did read the form and that his attorney helped him understand what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139119 - 2015-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS
did not appeal under Wis. Stat. § 974.02(1) and Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30. ¶3 On June 25, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30041 - 2007-08-20
did not appeal under Wis. Stat. § 974.02(1) and Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30. ¶3 On June 25, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30041 - 2007-08-20
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. Jesse B. Eagle
sobriety tests were administered in concluding that probable cause did not exist. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7645 - 2017-09-19
sobriety tests were administered in concluding that probable cause did not exist. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7645 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
was that Jones, who did not testify, manipulated the State’s evidence in ways that Campbell could not precisely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88418 - 2012-10-22
was that Jones, who did not testify, manipulated the State’s evidence in ways that Campbell could not precisely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88418 - 2012-10-22
[PDF]
State v. Michael Strutz
agreement. Before sentencing, however, he moved to withdraw his pleas on the grounds that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14593 - 2017-09-21
agreement. Before sentencing, however, he moved to withdraw his pleas on the grounds that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14593 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
would have testified in favor of Levy; and (3) by failing to file a motion arguing that the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28010 - 2007-02-05
would have testified in favor of Levy; and (3) by failing to file a motion arguing that the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28010 - 2007-02-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was that Jones, who did not testify, manipulated the State’s evidence in ways that Campbell could not precisely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88418 - 2014-09-15
was that Jones, who did not testify, manipulated the State’s evidence in ways that Campbell could not precisely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88418 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
visitation, but only if each child agreed to the visitation.4 That order did not otherwise specify what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35183 - 2014-09-15
visitation, but only if each child agreed to the visitation.4 That order did not otherwise specify what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35183 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael V. Diak
court did not misuse its discretion by admitting testimony of prior bad acts and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14254 - 2005-03-31
court did not misuse its discretion by admitting testimony of prior bad acts and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14254 - 2005-03-31