Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43001 - 43010 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 43001 - 43010 of 58546 for speedy trial.
James Kasieta v. James Tennies
). We affirm the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3398 - 2005-03-31
). We affirm the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3398 - 2005-03-31
Winnebago County v. Paul M. Nigl
from both orders. ¶3 “The writ of coram nobis is a common law remedy which empowers the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6651 - 2005-03-31
from both orders. ¶3 “The writ of coram nobis is a common law remedy which empowers the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6651 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
wife or trial counsel or anyone from Atlas Cab—submitted an affidavit or testified on Sparks’s behalf
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117081 - 2017-09-21
wife or trial counsel or anyone from Atlas Cab—submitted an affidavit or testified on Sparks’s behalf
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117081 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief, alleging various instances of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522185 - 2022-05-18
for postconviction relief, alleging various instances of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522185 - 2022-05-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the grounds that the circuit court erred in denying his motion that his trial counsel was prejudicially
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233823 - 2019-01-30
on the grounds that the circuit court erred in denying his motion that his trial counsel was prejudicially
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233823 - 2019-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
that dismissed its negligence claim against a former employee, Nichole Meeker, following a trial to the court.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82635 - 2012-05-16
that dismissed its negligence claim against a former employee, Nichole Meeker, following a trial to the court.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82635 - 2012-05-16
CA Blank Order
“is illogical” because “[i]f the trial court is to have no discretion, then why does the form provided
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139597 - 2015-04-14
“is illogical” because “[i]f the trial court is to have no discretion, then why does the form provided
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139597 - 2015-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
-defense was not a theory on which Subdiaz-Osorio would have gone to trial, with or without the evidence he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89347 - 2012-11-14
-defense was not a theory on which Subdiaz-Osorio would have gone to trial, with or without the evidence he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89347 - 2012-11-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. Hamilton argues that: (1) he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel; and (2) he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187170 - 2017-09-21
motion. Hamilton argues that: (1) he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel; and (2) he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187170 - 2017-09-21
State v. Roger E. Smiley
, and that the court was not bound by the recommendation made by the State. The court requested trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13638 - 2005-03-31
, and that the court was not bound by the recommendation made by the State. The court requested trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13638 - 2005-03-31