Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43001 - 43010 of 58267 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Randy H. Nelson
. Nelson argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion for plea withdrawal. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4944 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Bruce W. Williamson v. Jerry H. Firnstahl
the parties’ submissions on summary judgment, the trial court concluded that Tracy & Sons had established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11167 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Alton B. Ison, Jr. v. Lucille V. Nefstead
road through the property south of Lot 7 to Lot 6. The trial court determined that a 30’ x 30’ area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14562 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Gary R. Knutson
the premises. On appeal, Knutson maintains the argument that comprised his primary defense at trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9469 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
-defense was not a theory on which Subdiaz-Osorio would have gone to trial, with or without the evidence he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89347 - 2012-11-14

Yusef L. Williams v. Matthew J. Frank
that the alleged error harmed him. As the trial court noted, he could only show harm by proving that the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6591 - 2005-03-31

State v. Roger E. Smiley
, and that the court was not bound by the recommendation made by the State. The court requested trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13637 - 2005-03-31

Milwaukee Insurance Company v. Richard Hurd
-claimed against Hurd and counter-claimed against MIC on his personal injury cause of action. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11093 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of [the trial or] [the plea] and which is of such a nature that knowledge of its existence at the time … would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526681 - 2022-06-01

State v. Anthony F. Skibba, Sr.
at trial was insufficient to support the convictions. We disagree and affirm for the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3281 - 2005-03-31