Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43011 - 43020 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 43011 - 43020 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. We conclude that the trial court order does not require Klawitter to execute a satisfaction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34799 - 2008-12-03
in this case. We conclude that the trial court order does not require Klawitter to execute a satisfaction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34799 - 2008-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
)). The reasonableness of a stop is determined based on the totality of the facts and circumstances in the case. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61616 - 2011-03-23
)). The reasonableness of a stop is determined based on the totality of the facts and circumstances in the case. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61616 - 2011-03-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
). No. 2007AP1580-CR 4 ¶8 Judges may not initiate ex parte communications concerning a pending case. SCR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31176 - 2014-09-15
). No. 2007AP1580-CR 4 ¶8 Judges may not initiate ex parte communications concerning a pending case. SCR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31176 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585243 - 2022-11-09
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585243 - 2022-11-09
State v. Michael R. Saich
in the third paragraph of the court’s opinion. The only prior reference to the “circumstances” of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2380 - 2005-03-31
in the third paragraph of the court’s opinion. The only prior reference to the “circumstances” of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2380 - 2005-03-31
Hugh R. Mommsen v. Duane Schueller
and affirm the order. Background ¶2 The underlying case involved the Mommsens’ challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4257 - 2005-03-31
and affirm the order. Background ¶2 The underlying case involved the Mommsens’ challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4257 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). Nos. 2019AP1782 2019AP1783 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. In these consolidated cases, Delante D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367402 - 2021-05-19
). Nos. 2019AP1782 2019AP1783 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. In these consolidated cases, Delante D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367402 - 2021-05-19
[PDF]
William Trussoni v. Fred J. Pedretti
case is often, however, subject to being distinguishable.” The court therefore concluded that Lunde
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7025 - 2017-09-20
case is often, however, subject to being distinguishable.” The court therefore concluded that Lunde
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7025 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Julia K. Wleklinski v. Trostel
. The circuit court concluded that it was without jurisdiction to hear the case on the merits because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2613 - 2017-09-19
. The circuit court concluded that it was without jurisdiction to hear the case on the merits because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2613 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=769887 - 2024-02-28
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=769887 - 2024-02-28