Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43011 - 43020 of 57315 for id.

State v. James Hubert Tucker, Jr.
this, the court's analysis should begin with the plain language of the statutory text. Id., ¶45. If the language
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17866 - 2005-05-03

State v. Romell Lampley
) the character and rehabilitative needs of the offender, and (3) the need to protect the public.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2342 - 2005-03-31

Commercial Mortgage & Finance Co. v. Clerk of the Circuit Court
look to the “relevant language of the entire statute.” Id. “[A] statutory provision must be read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7131 - 2005-03-31

Barron County v. Kathy S.
an erroneous instruction, a new trial is not warranted unless the error is prejudicial. See id. at 429, 543
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15970 - 2005-03-31

State v. Timothy D. Kingstad
also “personally ascertain whether a factual basis exists to support a plea.” Id. Kingstad argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12841 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tamar T. Brown
. To the extent that conflicts arose in the trial testimony, it was the jury’s job to resolve them. Id. at 506
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20587 - 2005-12-12

State v. Joseph D. Haas
whose result is reliable.” Id. “The defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15954 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Northern States Power Company v. National Gas Company, Inc.
and would be unreasonably expensive to service. See id. at 228, 16 N.W. at 795. In reaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15609 - 2017-09-21

Leah Salamone v. WEA Insurance Corporation
have, but did not reach. See id. The jury was entitled to find that the evidence presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10627 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard G. White
.” Id., 466 U.S. at 694. ¶11 Our review of a trial court’s resolution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6424 - 2005-03-31