Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43021 - 43030 of 98601 for civil court case status online.
Search results 43021 - 43030 of 98601 for civil court case status online.
CA Blank Order
court denied the motion, concluding that, under existing case law, the dog sniff did not constitute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113224 - 2014-06-03
court denied the motion, concluding that, under existing case law, the dog sniff did not constitute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113224 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
State v. Javier Salgado
with the trial court that Vetter’s strategic decision to keep the cases together was a reasonable one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2754 - 2017-09-19
with the trial court that Vetter’s strategic decision to keep the cases together was a reasonable one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2754 - 2017-09-19
State v. Javier Salgado
THE COURT: And it’s my understanding that you’ve made a decision not to testify in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2754 - 2005-03-31
THE COURT: And it’s my understanding that you’ve made a decision not to testify in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2754 - 2005-03-31
Ronald W. Morters v. Joseph R. Kuenzli and Shila A. Kuenzili
Morters and the other plaintiffs in this litigation. This appeal constitutes court of appeals case no. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13686 - 2005-03-31
Morters and the other plaintiffs in this litigation. This appeal constitutes court of appeals case no. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13686 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald W. Morters v. Joseph R. Kuenzli and Shila A. Kuenzli
and the other plaintiffs in this litigation. This appeal constitutes court of appeals case no. 97-3054
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13159 - 2017-09-21
and the other plaintiffs in this litigation. This appeal constitutes court of appeals case no. 97-3054
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13159 - 2017-09-21
Ronald W. Morters v. Joseph R. Kuenzli and Shila A. Kuenzli
Morters and the other plaintiffs in this litigation. This appeal constitutes court of appeals case no. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13159 - 2005-03-31
Morters and the other plaintiffs in this litigation. This appeal constitutes court of appeals case no. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13159 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald W. Morters v. Joseph R. Kuenzli and Shila A. Kuenzili
and the other plaintiffs in this litigation. This appeal constitutes court of appeals case no. 97-3054
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13686 - 2014-09-15
and the other plaintiffs in this litigation. This appeal constitutes court of appeals case no. 97-3054
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13686 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tony M. Smith
(1984), the United States Supreme Court drew the distinction between the “result” (in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8414 - 2005-03-31
(1984), the United States Supreme Court drew the distinction between the “result” (in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8414 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tony M. Smith
(1984), the United States Supreme Court drew the distinction between the “result” (in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8413 - 2005-03-31
(1984), the United States Supreme Court drew the distinction between the “result” (in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8413 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tony M. Smith
(1984), the United States Supreme Court drew the distinction between the “result” (in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8415 - 2005-03-31
(1984), the United States Supreme Court drew the distinction between the “result” (in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8415 - 2005-03-31