Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43021 - 43030 of 77061 for judgment for u s.
Search results 43021 - 43030 of 77061 for judgment for u s.
Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah(Khan) v. Daniel Bertrand
. The test under par. (a) is the sole evidence of use of intoxicants; 2. A major penalty as defined in s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11890 - 2005-03-31
. The test under par. (a) is the sole evidence of use of intoxicants; 2. A major penalty as defined in s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11890 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tommy Smith, Jr. v. Daren Swenson
S. Ct. 2052 (1984). However, counsel’s performance is neither deficient nor prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18681 - 2017-09-21
S. Ct. 2052 (1984). However, counsel’s performance is neither deficient nor prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18681 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2001
% Criminal 116 143 129 162 550 Percentage 47% 42% 37% 35% 39% %s of Disposition: Affirmed
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32 - 2017-09-20
% Criminal 116 143 129 162 550 Percentage 47% 42% 37% 35% 39% %s of Disposition: Affirmed
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, he immediately forwarded them to the respondent and the respondent[’s] attorney of record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218461 - 2018-08-30
, he immediately forwarded them to the respondent and the respondent[’s] attorney of record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218461 - 2018-08-30
Design Services v. DNR
is entitled to a contested case hearing. However, § 77.88(2)(f) provides that “[n]otwithstanding s. 77.90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21626 - 2006-03-01
is entitled to a contested case hearing. However, § 77.88(2)(f) provides that “[n]otwithstanding s. 77.90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21626 - 2006-03-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
” and that “[c]onfinement for the entire time available [wa]s appropriate and necessary to protect the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27381 - 2014-09-15
” and that “[c]onfinement for the entire time available [wa]s appropriate and necessary to protect the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27381 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
99 64 76 70 309 Percentage 53% 42% 40% 39% 44% %s of Disposition: Affirmed Reversed
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522182 - 2022-05-12
99 64 76 70 309 Percentage 53% 42% 40% 39% 44% %s of Disposition: Affirmed Reversed
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522182 - 2022-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
% %s of Disposition: Affirmed Reversed Other 81% 13% 5% 77% 16% 7% 72% 22
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32394 - 2014-09-15
% %s of Disposition: Affirmed Reversed Other 81% 13% 5% 77% 16% 7% 72% 22
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32394 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing and concluded “the information presented in [Miller]’s postconviction motion simply does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059263 - 2026-01-13
hearing and concluded “the information presented in [Miller]’s postconviction motion simply does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059263 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statement that this evidence “outweigh[s]” the previous claims. This is insufficient to meet the clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041687 - 2025-11-25
statement that this evidence “outweigh[s]” the previous claims. This is insufficient to meet the clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041687 - 2025-11-25