Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43021 - 43030 of 50521 for our.

[PDF] State v. Joseph H. Eckstein
, we: may not substitute [our] judgment for that of the trier of fact unless the evidence, viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2145 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 42
). Our role is limited to reviewing the record to determine if credible and substantial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60297 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jade Lamont Cosby
in the outcome.” Id. at 694. ¶9 Our standard for reviewing this claim involves a mixed question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4319 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
1 Our opinion resolving Cole’s first appeal suggests that this case involves one judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57655 - 2014-09-15

State v. Howard D. Platt
N.W.2d at 104. Our review of the record indicates that under the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13232 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
while under the influence. As the circuit court properly noted, our supreme court reiterated in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78917 - 2012-03-05

COURT OF APPEALS
to first position. Id. at 150-51. On appeal, our supreme court reversed, holding: [W]here a senior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91939 - 2013-01-22

[PDF] State v. James L.C.
pursuant to § 752.31(2)(e), STATS. "We" and "our" refer to the court. No. 94-2468 -2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8112 - 2017-09-19

State v. Paul Matek
that the person will engage in acts of sexual violence. We discern three elements from our reading of this statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13059 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Richard J. Schwarten v. Leslie Smith
, 424 N.W.2d 691 (1988). Our review of the trial court’s discretionary decision is confined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5461 - 2017-09-19