Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43021 - 43030 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 43021 - 43030 of 58547 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Felten
should be modified. ¶4 The trial court held a hearing and received Felten’s expert’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3918 - 2017-09-20
should be modified. ¶4 The trial court held a hearing and received Felten’s expert’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3918 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06 (2003-04). Wheeler claimed that: (1) he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34836 - 2008-12-08
. § 974.06 (2003-04). Wheeler claimed that: (1) he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34836 - 2008-12-08
2007 WI APP 273
to present any different evidence at trial regarding the defendant’s actual level of intoxication. Second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31006 - 2007-12-18
to present any different evidence at trial regarding the defendant’s actual level of intoxication. Second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31006 - 2007-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is consistent with an update to the pattern jury instruction that went into effect after Flannery’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982123 - 2025-07-15
is consistent with an update to the pattern jury instruction that went into effect after Flannery’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982123 - 2025-07-15
CA Blank Order
cases, alleging that the State had breached its plea agreement at sentencing and that Dillon’s trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104911 - 2013-12-03
cases, alleging that the State had breached its plea agreement at sentencing and that Dillon’s trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104911 - 2013-12-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
responsibility pursuant to § 48.415(6)(a). At trial, it was undisputed that C.R. had previously been adjudged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238272 - 2019-03-27
responsibility pursuant to § 48.415(6)(a). At trial, it was undisputed that C.R. had previously been adjudged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238272 - 2019-03-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
another postconviction motion, seeking to withdraw his pleas on grounds his trial counsel had been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185364 - 2017-09-21
another postconviction motion, seeking to withdraw his pleas on grounds his trial counsel had been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185364 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
affirm the circuit court’s order.2 ¶2 Although Groenke proceeded to trial on the charges against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36147 - 2014-09-15
affirm the circuit court’s order.2 ¶2 Although Groenke proceeded to trial on the charges against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36147 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
to trial if the element had been better explained to him. Mueller admitted—both to the presentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110459 - 2014-04-14
to trial if the element had been better explained to him. Mueller admitted—both to the presentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110459 - 2014-04-14
District II/IV March 1, 2013 To: Hon. Anthony G. Milisauskas Circuit Court Judge Kenosha County C...
counsel, filed a postconviction motion. In relevant part, Tucker contended that trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93596 - 2013-02-28
counsel, filed a postconviction motion. In relevant part, Tucker contended that trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93596 - 2013-02-28