Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43031 - 43040 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 43031 - 43040 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
bad faith claim pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 102.18(1)(bp).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79223 - 2014-09-15
bad faith claim pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 102.18(1)(bp).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79223 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nikolas J. Tries
. § 947.01. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15784 - 2017-09-21
. § 947.01. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15784 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Love v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
, claiming that it was unconstitutional. The DOR denied the partnership's claim by notice of adjustment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8027 - 2017-09-19
, claiming that it was unconstitutional. The DOR denied the partnership's claim by notice of adjustment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8027 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
assaulted the victim and claimed that a friend he was with had punched the victim. The administrative
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=678665 - 2023-07-19
assaulted the victim and claimed that a friend he was with had punched the victim. The administrative
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=678665 - 2023-07-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Hammer’s claims under Wis. Stat. § 974.06, he was not entitled to relief. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119568 - 2014-08-18
Hammer’s claims under Wis. Stat. § 974.06, he was not entitled to relief. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119568 - 2014-08-18
State v. Kenneth L. Larson
, in violation of § 161.41(1m), Stats., 1991-92.[1] He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9365 - 2005-03-31
, in violation of § 161.41(1m), Stats., 1991-92.[1] He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9365 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
strangled from the front. The assault victim claimed to have lost consciousness, and then acquiesced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101935 - 2013-09-10
strangled from the front. The assault victim claimed to have lost consciousness, and then acquiesced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101935 - 2013-09-10
CA Blank Order
“Example Attempted Armed Robbery” shows that this claim has no merit. Further, his reliance on State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107688 - 2014-02-04
“Example Attempted Armed Robbery” shows that this claim has no merit. Further, his reliance on State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107688 - 2014-02-04
State v. Jennifer V.
, with placement continuing with her paternal grandmother. Jennifer V., claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9900 - 2005-03-31
, with placement continuing with her paternal grandmother. Jennifer V., claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9900 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to state a claim. After a hearing, the circuit court dismissed the complaint and this appeal follows. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79822 - 2012-03-26
to state a claim. After a hearing, the circuit court dismissed the complaint and this appeal follows. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79822 - 2012-03-26