Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43041 - 43050 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 43041 - 43050 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Hugh R. Mommsen v. Duane Schueller
and affirm the order. Background ¶2 The underlying case involved the Mommsens’ challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4257 - 2005-03-31
and affirm the order. Background ¶2 The underlying case involved the Mommsens’ challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4257 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that he would need to contact the district attorney’s office if he wanted to reopen the case. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74184 - 2011-11-22
that he would need to contact the district attorney’s office if he wanted to reopen the case. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74184 - 2011-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at No. 2017AP619 2 conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211799 - 2018-04-23
and record, we conclude at No. 2017AP619 2 conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211799 - 2018-04-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
). No. 2007AP1580-CR 4 ¶8 Judges may not initiate ex parte communications concerning a pending case. SCR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31176 - 2014-09-15
). No. 2007AP1580-CR 4 ¶8 Judges may not initiate ex parte communications concerning a pending case. SCR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31176 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the first time in the case. He moved to vacate the default judgment pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 806.07(1)(h
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113464 - 2017-09-21
for the first time in the case. He moved to vacate the default judgment pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 806.07(1)(h
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113464 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that counsel’s failure to address Harris’s alleged statement prejudiced the defense because it was a close case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27091 - 2014-09-15
that counsel’s failure to address Harris’s alleged statement prejudiced the defense because it was a close case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27091 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David V. Penn
encountered the defendant in a pending felony drug case and discussed the case out of the presence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16991 - 2017-09-21
encountered the defendant in a pending felony drug case and discussed the case out of the presence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16991 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
, ¶35 (“A trial court’s general authority to maintain the orderly and prompt processing of cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27853 - 2007-01-22
, ¶35 (“A trial court’s general authority to maintain the orderly and prompt processing of cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27853 - 2007-01-22
The Estate of Richmond P. Izard v. Richmond P. Izard
, we remanded this case to the same trial court “to consider any implications that the calls of [Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5906 - 2005-03-31
, we remanded this case to the same trial court “to consider any implications that the calls of [Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5906 - 2005-03-31
Columbia County v. Gary O. Kloostra
will be controlling precedent for this case and will, consequently, control the decision of this case.” ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3970 - 2005-03-31
will be controlling precedent for this case and will, consequently, control the decision of this case.” ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3970 - 2005-03-31