Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43071 - 43080 of 55286 for n c c.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2020AP404-CR(C) ¶40 DUGAN, J. (concurring). I concur with the Majority’s analysis of the guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393239 - 2021-08-18

[PDF] State v. Mark O. Williams
and an order of the circuit court for Door County: PETER C. DILTZ, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5692 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Eric Rodriguez
Rodriguez. C. The trial court properly denied Rodriguez’s postconviction motion. ¶24 Rodriguez filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14328 - 2014-09-15

Sandra Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests, Inc.
further explained: [C]ourts have taken a common sense approach when determining the scope of pollution
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17069 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
range of reasonable professional assistance.” Additionally, “[c]ounsel’s decisions in choosing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293995 - 2020-10-06

[PDF] WI APP 59
in the first two counts of the information, (b) the jury instructions on those two counts, and (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36091 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Richard L. Bollig
it was the intent of the legislature that a circuit court lose competency if the provisions of § 980.06(2)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12828 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
because of a violation of … [c]h. [ATCP] 134, a right to recover twice the amount of pecuniary loss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1140239 - 2026-07-02

State v. Eric Rodriguez
that it was objectively biased against Rodriguez. C. The trial court properly denied Rodriguez’s postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14328 - 2005-03-31

State v. Bernard G. Fearing
of probation: (1) (a) Except as provided in par. (c) or if probation is prohibited for a particular offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16172 - 2005-03-31