Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43071 - 43080 of 50521 for our.
Search results 43071 - 43080 of 50521 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 30, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
factual findings are not clearly erroneous. Thus, our review is limited to whether the traffic stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33523 - 2008-07-29
factual findings are not clearly erroneous. Thus, our review is limited to whether the traffic stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33523 - 2008-07-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
WI App 206, ¶22, 305 Wis. 2d 467, 739 N.W.2d 834. Our determination must nevertheless give weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954933 - 2025-05-13
WI App 206, ¶22, 305 Wis. 2d 467, 739 N.W.2d 834. Our determination must nevertheless give weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954933 - 2025-05-13
WI App 82 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2400 Complete Title of...
. Riegleman v. Krieg, 2004 WI App 85, ¶20, 271 Wis. 2d 798, 679 N.W.2d 857. Our examination of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97397 - 2013-06-25
. Riegleman v. Krieg, 2004 WI App 85, ¶20, 271 Wis. 2d 798, 679 N.W.2d 857. Our examination of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97397 - 2013-06-25
Daniel Aguilar v. Matthew J. Frank
with that issue. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶3 Our certiorari review is limited to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19117 - 2005-07-27
with that issue. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶3 Our certiorari review is limited to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19117 - 2005-07-27
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to resentencing. ¶10 Our supreme court has recognized that a defendant who is seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25
is entitled to resentencing. ¶10 Our supreme court has recognized that a defendant who is seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. That information, however, is not necessary to our determination. No. 2019AP2001 4 serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344158 - 2021-03-09
. That information, however, is not necessary to our determination. No. 2019AP2001 4 serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344158 - 2021-03-09
[PDF]
State v. Joseph C. Coles
in that exact amount—185 days.2 2 “Time served” is our phrase, not the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10346 - 2017-09-20
in that exact amount—185 days.2 2 “Time served” is our phrase, not the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10346 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Peter D. Grefsheim
, both of which involve the interpretation of § 343.305, STATS., and are subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14954 - 2017-09-21
, both of which involve the interpretation of § 343.305, STATS., and are subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14954 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Thus, the court dismissed the case. Delsart now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶10 Our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88714 - 2014-09-15
. Thus, the court dismissed the case. Delsart now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶10 Our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88714 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
-08 version unless otherwise noted. 4 We decline Nancy’s invitation to reconsider our decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36802 - 2014-09-15
-08 version unless otherwise noted. 4 We decline Nancy’s invitation to reconsider our decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36802 - 2014-09-15