Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43081 - 43090 of 58253 for speedy trial.
Search results 43081 - 43090 of 58253 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
trial attorneys were ineffective for failing to seek recusal or substitution of Judge Duket. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109409 - 2014-03-24
trial attorneys were ineffective for failing to seek recusal or substitution of Judge Duket. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109409 - 2014-03-24
[PDF]
Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis
. CURLEY, J. Tee & Bee, Inc., appeals from a trial court order affirming the West Allis Common
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11161 - 2017-09-19
. CURLEY, J. Tee & Bee, Inc., appeals from a trial court order affirming the West Allis Common
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11161 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52591 - 2014-09-15
the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52591 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
trial, the circuit court: entered judgment for replevin of the trailer in favor of Griswold; entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93183 - 2013-02-20
trial, the circuit court: entered judgment for replevin of the trailer in favor of Griswold; entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93183 - 2013-02-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a violation of their right of first refusal: The [trial] court’s refusal to grant specific performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169972 - 2017-09-21
is a violation of their right of first refusal: The [trial] court’s refusal to grant specific performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169972 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Raymond J. Topps v. County of Walworth
). Whether those alleged facts can withstand the rigors of a trial has yet to be determined. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5024 - 2017-09-19
). Whether those alleged facts can withstand the rigors of a trial has yet to be determined. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5024 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. The trial court denied Goretski’s motion to suppress evidence from the stop, finding that under all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33189 - 2008-06-25
. The trial court denied Goretski’s motion to suppress evidence from the stop, finding that under all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33189 - 2008-06-25
Mark Block v. Circuit Court for Dane County
]xamination and cross-examination of deponents may proceed as permitted at the trial.” ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2301 - 2005-03-31
]xamination and cross-examination of deponents may proceed as permitted at the trial.” ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2301 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Sandles
(1990). In reviewing a denial of a motion to suppress, this court will uphold the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5719 - 2017-09-19
(1990). In reviewing a denial of a motion to suppress, this court will uphold the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5719 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there might be a problem. The videotape was received as evidence at the trial and serves as the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238786 - 2019-04-10
there might be a problem. The videotape was received as evidence at the trial and serves as the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238786 - 2019-04-10