Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4311 - 4320 of 17074 for Search wicourts.gov.

[PDF] State v. Mel Scott Regazzi
the execution of a search warrant for stolen property was lawful. We No. 03-1770-CR 2 conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6643 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI 60
enforcement officer to search the defendant's person, vehicle, or residence for firearms, at any time
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83494 - 2014-09-15

State v. Keith Schroeder
that the terminology might come up at trial. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15926 - 2005-03-31

State v. Keith Schroeder
that the terminology might come up at trial. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15529 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 15
searched his vehicle after arresting him for possession of marijuana, and that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58245 - 2014-09-15

WI App 15 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP599-CR Complete Titl...
] that police officers illegally searched his vehicle after arresting him for possession of marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58245 - 2011-01-30

State v. Lance R. Ward
during the search of Ward’s home should have been suppressed because the affidavit submitted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17286 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] STATE OF WISCONSIN
residence was a Fourth Amendment violation, should the evidence found from the execution of a search
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/scull.pdf - 2014-09-23

[PDF] State v. Robert F. Jones
that he was armed and therefore the officer’s patdown search was illegal. We agree that the officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19063 - 2017-09-21

State v. Stanley Soward
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2834 - 2005-03-31