Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4311 - 4320 of 69366 for as he.
Search results 4311 - 4320 of 69366 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
guilty of three counts of burglary. Proceeding pro se, he filed a postconviction motion in January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70527 - 2014-09-15
guilty of three counts of burglary. Proceeding pro se, he filed a postconviction motion in January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70527 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kris A. Westberg
all evidence alleging that there was no probable cause to support his arrest. He is appealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7525 - 2017-09-19
all evidence alleging that there was no probable cause to support his arrest. He is appealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7525 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from orders denying him an interpreter based on trial court findings that he does not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58204 - 2010-12-28
appeals from orders denying him an interpreter based on trial court findings that he does not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58204 - 2010-12-28
COURT OF APPEALS
MANGERSON, J.[1] Bradley Hart appeals an order concluding he unlawfully refused to take a test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98183 - 2013-06-17
MANGERSON, J.[1] Bradley Hart appeals an order concluding he unlawfully refused to take a test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98183 - 2013-06-17
[PDF]
City of Whitewater v. Robert P. Michor
investigate whether he was driving while intoxicated. Michor points out that the officer saw only that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4683 - 2017-09-19
investigate whether he was driving while intoxicated. Michor points out that the officer saw only that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4683 - 2017-09-19
State v. George D.M.
not reflect his best interests. In particular, he describes the racist graffiti which he affixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11077 - 2005-03-31
not reflect his best interests. In particular, he describes the racist graffiti which he affixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11077 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel E. Creviston
obtained as a result of what he claims was his unlawful arrest for possessing open intoxicants, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15533 - 2017-09-21
obtained as a result of what he claims was his unlawful arrest for possessing open intoxicants, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15533 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
convicting him of three counts of third-degree sexual assault. He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102416 - 2013-09-30
convicting him of three counts of third-degree sexual assault. He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102416 - 2013-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Steven Schelk
. Jost questioned Schelk as a witness to the assault. Jost testified that while talking to Schelk he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13486 - 2017-09-21
. Jost questioned Schelk as a witness to the assault. Jost testified that while talking to Schelk he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13486 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. George D.M.
. In particular, he describes the racist graffiti which he affixed to the outside of a church, many of whose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11077 - 2017-09-19
. In particular, he describes the racist graffiti which he affixed to the outside of a church, many of whose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11077 - 2017-09-19