Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4311 - 4320 of 55437 for n c.
Search results 4311 - 4320 of 55437 for n c.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. JIMMIE C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64979 - 2014-09-15
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. JIMMIE C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64979 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
)(c); (2) the sentencing court failed to consider the factors set forth in § 973.20(13)(a) when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116633 - 2014-07-07
)(c); (2) the sentencing court failed to consider the factors set forth in § 973.20(13)(a) when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116633 - 2014-07-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” that the convictions would be expunged and the convictions were low on the scale of “[c]riminal falsely offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333335 - 2021-02-09
” that the convictions would be expunged and the convictions were low on the scale of “[c]riminal falsely offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333335 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. ATTORNEYS: For the respondents-respondents-petitioners, there were briefs filed by Deborah C. Meiners
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489857 - 2022-04-05
. ATTORNEYS: For the respondents-respondents-petitioners, there were briefs filed by Deborah C. Meiners
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489857 - 2022-04-05
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Michael C. Sanders, assistant attorney general, with whom
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189070 - 2017-09-21
. For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Michael C. Sanders, assistant attorney general, with whom
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189070 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 43
-cross-respondents, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Elizabeth C. Stephens of Cranfill Sumner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=828330 - 2024-09-11
-cross-respondents, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Elizabeth C. Stephens of Cranfill Sumner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=828330 - 2024-09-11
[PDF]
WI APP 36
SOFTWARE, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, MICHAEL C. HALL AND KEVIN C. AUSTIN, DEFENDANTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78323 - 2014-09-15
SOFTWARE, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, MICHAEL C. HALL AND KEVIN C. AUSTIN, DEFENDANTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78323 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
the Special Assessment District. See § 66.0703(5)(c), (d). Concerning the two parcels owned by Emjay
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64259 - 2011-05-16
the Special Assessment District. See § 66.0703(5)(c), (d). Concerning the two parcels owned by Emjay
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64259 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Wideman
. § 346.65(2)(c), the OWI penalty enhancer. 3 The circuit court denied the defendant’s motion to vacate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16999 - 2017-09-21
. § 346.65(2)(c), the OWI penalty enhancer. 3 The circuit court denied the defendant’s motion to vacate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16999 - 2017-09-21
WI App 36 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP788 Complete Title of ...
, v. Sideline Software, Inc., Defendant-Respondent, Michael C. Hall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78323 - 2012-03-27
, v. Sideline Software, Inc., Defendant-Respondent, Michael C. Hall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78323 - 2012-03-27