Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43111 - 43120 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 43111 - 43120 of 74812 for public records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in camera review of the victim’s counseling records. He also argues he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517577 - 2022-05-11
in camera review of the victim’s counseling records. He also argues he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517577 - 2022-05-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but this finding is contradicted by the record. Specifically, Van Rossum testified that, under Capitoland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488149 - 2022-02-24
, but this finding is contradicted by the record. Specifically, Van Rossum testified that, under Capitoland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488149 - 2022-02-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a body-worn camera during the execution of the search warrant that recorded law enforcement’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082385 - 2026-02-24
a body-worn camera during the execution of the search warrant that recorded law enforcement’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082385 - 2026-02-24
[PDF]
State v. Carlos Santiago
knowingly and intelligently waived his rights is unsupported by the current evidentiary record in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7862 - 2017-09-19
knowingly and intelligently waived his rights is unsupported by the current evidentiary record in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7862 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and contained in her treatment and detention records. The circuit court did not err. These statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144455 - 2017-09-21
and contained in her treatment and detention records. The circuit court did not err. These statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144455 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 116
offices was unlawful because it seized business records unrelated to the warrant, which the State used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28507 - 2014-09-15
offices was unlawful because it seized business records unrelated to the warrant, which the State used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28507 - 2014-09-15
State v. Carlos Santiago
rights is unsupported by the current evidentiary record in this case. Further, because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7862 - 2005-03-31
rights is unsupported by the current evidentiary record in this case. Further, because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7862 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 116
because it seized business records unrelated to the warrant, which the State used as evidence of the theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28507 - 2007-04-26
because it seized business records unrelated to the warrant, which the State used as evidence of the theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28507 - 2007-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS
and contained in her treatment and detention records. The circuit court did not err. These statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144455 - 2015-07-15
and contained in her treatment and detention records. The circuit court did not err. These statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144455 - 2015-07-15
[PDF]
ADA Accommodation request for oral exam - 2022
document. The test taker's oral renditions are digitally recorded. Consecutive Interpreting
/services/interpreter/docs/adaexamoral.pdf - 2022-03-11
document. The test taker's oral renditions are digitally recorded. Consecutive Interpreting
/services/interpreter/docs/adaexamoral.pdf - 2022-03-11