Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43141 - 43150 of 68502 for did.
Search results 43141 - 43150 of 68502 for did.
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
or inspection, and did not move to suppress Crochiere's inculpatory statements. He also challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9586 - 2005-03-31
or inspection, and did not move to suppress Crochiere's inculpatory statements. He also challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9586 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the existence of a new factor and, thus, the circuit court did not err when it denied his motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435309 - 2021-10-05
the existence of a new factor and, thus, the circuit court did not err when it denied his motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435309 - 2021-10-05
[PDF]
State v. Brian W. Shaw
specifically stated that it was “not resentencing [Shaw],” the trial court did, in fact, impose a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15120 - 2017-09-21
specifically stated that it was “not resentencing [Shaw],” the trial court did, in fact, impose a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15120 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Iowa County v. Iowa County Highway Department Employees
on June 5, 1998. He did not have a CDL for eighty-four days, during which time he operated equipment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2530 - 2017-09-19
on June 5, 1998. He did not have a CDL for eighty-four days, during which time he operated equipment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2530 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the request, explaining why the sentences were made consecutive. The order did not expressly mention
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454111 - 2021-11-23
the request, explaining why the sentences were made consecutive. The order did not expressly mention
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454111 - 2021-11-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
- 26, 556 N.W.2d 356 (Ct. App. 1996). We will not consider this issue because Collazo did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32531 - 2014-09-15
- 26, 556 N.W.2d 356 (Ct. App. 1996). We will not consider this issue because Collazo did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32531 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jerome M. Wywial
privileges, did not constitute multiple punishments, and did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10813 - 2017-09-20
privileges, did not constitute multiple punishments, and did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10813 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d at 58. ¶8 Vinje argues that under the totality of the circumstances, Carey did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32178 - 2008-03-24
. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d at 58. ¶8 Vinje argues that under the totality of the circumstances, Carey did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32178 - 2008-03-24
State v. James B. Johnson
, Johnson did not resist. Johnson argues that because § 947.01(1), Stats., is aimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9019 - 2005-03-31
, Johnson did not resist. Johnson argues that because § 947.01(1), Stats., is aimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9019 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Estella Marie Iddings
, such conflicts did not render her testimony incredible as a matter of law. It was for the jury to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11451 - 2017-09-19
, such conflicts did not render her testimony incredible as a matter of law. It was for the jury to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11451 - 2017-09-19