Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43161 - 43170 of 83901 for case number.
Search results 43161 - 43170 of 83901 for case number.
COURT OF APPEALS
for resentencing before a different judge, who has not seen this case before and is not privy to any of this record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48820 - 2010-04-07
for resentencing before a different judge, who has not seen this case before and is not privy to any of this record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48820 - 2010-04-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
definition, arguing that the case was factually distinguishable and the instruction would contribute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31105 - 2014-09-15
definition, arguing that the case was factually distinguishable and the instruction would contribute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31105 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
objected to giving the jury the Proegler definition, arguing that the case was factually distinguishable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31105 - 2007-12-11
objected to giving the jury the Proegler definition, arguing that the case was factually distinguishable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31105 - 2007-12-11
[PDF]
State v. Greg A. Mayer
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3664-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13403 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3664-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13403 - 2017-09-21
Phyllis A. Tannler v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑0118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10237 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑0118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10237 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case has a relatively long and confusing procedural history, rife
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132809 - 2017-09-21
). We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case has a relatively long and confusing procedural history, rife
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132809 - 2017-09-21
City of Oshkosh v. Christopher Mack
triggered a “Notice to Appear” from the trial court dated July 2, 1996, setting the case for a court trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11148 - 2005-03-31
triggered a “Notice to Appear” from the trial court dated July 2, 1996, setting the case for a court trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11148 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2 The charges in this case arose from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259987 - 2020-05-12
. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2 The charges in this case arose from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259987 - 2020-05-12
Sonya Theis v. John H. Short
mother’s estate. The trial court concluded that the doctrine of law of the case applied and that under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19132 - 2005-07-27
mother’s estate. The trial court concluded that the doctrine of law of the case applied and that under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19132 - 2005-07-27
[PDF]
Chuck Belke v. M & I First National Bank of Stevens Point
of the case, therefore, is that whether or not the certificates are "instruments" under § 409.105(1)(i
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9309 - 2017-09-19
of the case, therefore, is that whether or not the certificates are "instruments" under § 409.105(1)(i
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9309 - 2017-09-19