Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43161 - 43170 of 62078 for child support.
Search results 43161 - 43170 of 62078 for child support.
State v. Jamale A. Bonds
months initial confinement and six months extended supervision. In support of its sentencing request
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25755 - 2006-06-29
months initial confinement and six months extended supervision. In support of its sentencing request
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25755 - 2006-06-29
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243158 - 2019-08-27
, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243158 - 2019-08-27
[PDF]
State v. Jamale A. Bonds
months extended supervision. In support of its sentencing request, the State asked that the habitual
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25755 - 2017-09-21
months extended supervision. In support of its sentencing request, the State asked that the habitual
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25755 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
or village equally. To support its conclusions, the court of appeals relied on the Legislative Fiscal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170436 - 2018-02-22
or village equally. To support its conclusions, the court of appeals relied on the Legislative Fiscal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170436 - 2018-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Matthew J. Knapp
to deterrence and judicial integrity, which are the underpinnings of the exclusionary rule, support
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16422 - 2017-09-21
to deterrence and judicial integrity, which are the underpinnings of the exclusionary rule, support
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16422 - 2017-09-21
State v. Matthew J. Knapp
of the exclusionary rule, support suppression of the physical evidence here. ¶3 In response to the second issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16422 - 2005-03-31
of the exclusionary rule, support suppression of the physical evidence here. ¶3 In response to the second issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16422 - 2005-03-31
State v. Allee Boone
235, 242 (1993). Applying the five criteria needed to support a motion for a new trial, we look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11317 - 2005-03-31
235, 242 (1993). Applying the five criteria needed to support a motion for a new trial, we look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11317 - 2005-03-31
State v. Casey J. Schneck
in a ch. 345 forfeiture prosecution. ¶6 In further support, Schneck points
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4979 - 2005-03-31
in a ch. 345 forfeiture prosecution. ¶6 In further support, Schneck points
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4979 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for operating the vehicle without insurance would be lawful “if it [was] supported by reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970388 - 2025-06-18
for operating the vehicle without insurance would be lawful “if it [was] supported by reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970388 - 2025-06-18
[PDF]
Ronald J. Taylor v. West American Insurance Company
only to the alleged tortfeasor, and not to other protected persons under the policy. ¶9 In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14780 - 2017-09-21
only to the alleged tortfeasor, and not to other protected persons under the policy. ¶9 In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14780 - 2017-09-21