Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43181 - 43190 of 98601 for civil court case status online.

State v. Paul R. Benzel
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3528-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13347 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 13
2024 WI APP 13 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2022AP199-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760452 - 2024-04-10

[PDF] Larry E. Olson v. Jon Litscher
2000 WI App 61 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1082-W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15428 - 2017-09-21

Larry E. Olson v. Jon Litscher
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1082-W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15428 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - April 2011
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES APRIL, 2011 The cases listed below
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62776 - 2014-09-15

[MS WORD] FA-604A: Stipulation to Change: Custody, Placement, Support, Maintenance, Arrears Payment, Balances
of the county in which you are filing this case. STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT, COUNTY Mark
/formdisplay/FA-604A.doc?formNumber=FA-604A&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2026-03-10

2007 WI APP 221
2007 WI App 221 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1705 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29861 - 2007-10-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the excess portion of his sentence. 1 See WIS. STAT. § 973.13 (2015-16) (“In any case where the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231130 - 2018-12-18

L. M. S. v. William Earl Atkinson
2006 WI App 116 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP1450 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25293 - 2006-06-27

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 23, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
of the case does not fit neatly under this label.) The court also rejected Tenneco’s nominal-party theory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74301 - 2011-11-22