Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4321 - 4330 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 4321 - 4330 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
2009 WI APP 7
some measure of custody, care or control over the dog. Generally, one who provides shelter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34757 - 2011-06-14
some measure of custody, care or control over the dog. Generally, one who provides shelter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34757 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
WI APP 7
. § 174.02, one must exercise some measure of custody, care or control over the dog. Generally, one who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34757 - 2014-09-15
. § 174.02, one must exercise some measure of custody, care or control over the dog. Generally, one who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34757 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Todd D. Dagnall
reversed a decision of the Circuit Court for Dane County, Patrick J. Fiedler, Judge, denying the motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17436 - 2017-09-21
reversed a decision of the Circuit Court for Dane County, Patrick J. Fiedler, Judge, denying the motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17436 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ferdinand Walters
. Ferdinand Walters appeals from an order denying his motion for relief from judgment. The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10796 - 2017-09-20
. Ferdinand Walters appeals from an order denying his motion for relief from judgment. The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10796 - 2017-09-20
State v. John C. Zittlow
Zittlow’s motion to suppress evidence and dismissing pending charges against him. The State asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25757 - 2006-07-04
Zittlow’s motion to suppress evidence and dismissing pending charges against him. The State asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25757 - 2006-07-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 66.0301(6). ¶11 The City filed a motion for summary judgment seeking an order declaring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=681171 - 2023-07-20
. § 66.0301(6). ¶11 The City filed a motion for summary judgment seeking an order declaring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=681171 - 2023-07-20
[PDF]
State v. Ronnie P.
: Motion to adjourn trial — Ronnie remained in custody. The court granted Attorney Mullison’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15143 - 2017-09-21
: Motion to adjourn trial — Ronnie remained in custody. The court granted Attorney Mullison’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15143 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Eugene G.
requires a reversal and his release from custody. This court concludes that the situation in Terry T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6692 - 2017-09-20
requires a reversal and his release from custody. This court concludes that the situation in Terry T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6692 - 2017-09-20
State v. Eugene G.
, supports his position that this case requires a reversal and his release from custody. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31
, supports his position that this case requires a reversal and his release from custody. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-Figueroa’s motion does not establish that he was in custody at the time he made the inconsistent statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103739 - 2017-09-21
-Figueroa’s motion does not establish that he was in custody at the time he made the inconsistent statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103739 - 2017-09-21