Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4321 - 4330 of 29823 for des.
Search results 4321 - 4330 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. William G. Campbell
will review the issue de novo. State v. Pheil, 152 Wis.2d 523, 529, 449 N.W.2d 858, 861 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10664 - 2017-09-20
will review the issue de novo. State v. Pheil, 152 Wis.2d 523, 529, 449 N.W.2d 858, 861 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10664 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. Cunningham
de novo. However, whether a new factor warrants a modification of sentence is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6654 - 2017-09-20
de novo. However, whether a new factor warrants a modification of sentence is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6654 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103472 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103472 - 2017-09-21
Village of Plover v. Dorothea W. Binagi
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Therefore, we review de novo whether the trial court erred in applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20564 - 2005-12-07
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Therefore, we review de novo whether the trial court erred in applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20564 - 2005-12-07
State v. David D. Brown
for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5045 - 2005-03-31
for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5045 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to be heard presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Vanmanivong, 2003 WI 41, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04
to be heard presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Vanmanivong, 2003 WI 41, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d 676. ¶4 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29885 - 2007-08-01
review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W.2d 676. ¶4 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29885 - 2007-08-01
State v. Jurgen Brinkman
, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251, 253 (1977). Our review is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10392 - 2005-03-31
, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251, 253 (1977). Our review is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10392 - 2005-03-31
Woodrow A. Wiedenhoeft v. Allstate Insurance Company
Insurance policy interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶12. Determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6177 - 2005-03-31
Insurance policy interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶12. Determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6177 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id., ¶36. ¶5 Plunkett contends that her statutory ineligibility for the Substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132839 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. Id., ¶36. ¶5 Plunkett contends that her statutory ineligibility for the Substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132839 - 2017-09-21