Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4321 - 4330 of 6110 for sheriff.
Search results 4321 - 4330 of 6110 for sheriff.
[PDF]
Banks Bros. Corporation v. Donovan Floors, Inc.
relationships between Banks and the Donovans, Banks scheduled a sheriff’s sale of the Donovans’ home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16258 - 2017-09-21
relationships between Banks and the Donovans, Banks scheduled a sheriff’s sale of the Donovans’ home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16258 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to be in custodia legis, there is “no question that” “no one could deprive the court or sheriff of either title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182877 - 2017-09-21
to be in custodia legis, there is “no question that” “no one could deprive the court or sheriff of either title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182877 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Washington County Sheriff’s Office was dispatched on November 30, 2019, to a report3 of a Ford minivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311615 - 2020-12-09
of the Washington County Sheriff’s Office was dispatched on November 30, 2019, to a report3 of a Ford minivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311615 - 2020-12-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sheriff’s deputy gave the following testimony, all of which was credited by the court. Late
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996559 - 2025-08-14
sheriff’s deputy gave the following testimony, all of which was credited by the court. Late
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996559 - 2025-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that defense counsel had the same problem with the defense copy. The prosecutor asked the sheriff’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907053 - 2025-01-30
that defense counsel had the same problem with the defense copy. The prosecutor asked the sheriff’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907053 - 2025-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“action to obtain the proof that [Ganta] was out or that the sheriff would put him out.” ¶12 Ganta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142162 - 2017-09-21
“action to obtain the proof that [Ganta] was out or that the sheriff would put him out.” ¶12 Ganta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the sheriff’s deputy who stopped the defendant. See id., ¶¶43, 47-48. The deputy had twelve and one-half
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263912 - 2020-06-09
of the sheriff’s deputy who stopped the defendant. See id., ¶¶43, 47-48. The deputy had twelve and one-half
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263912 - 2020-06-09
Rule Order
, the court may order the sheriff to bring before the court persons in the vicinity for determination
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33545 - 2008-07-24
, the court may order the sheriff to bring before the court persons in the vicinity for determination
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33545 - 2008-07-24
COURT OF APPEALS
unpersuasive, and affirm. FACTS ¶2 On March 29, 2009, a deputy with the Kenosha county sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66242 - 2011-06-21
unpersuasive, and affirm. FACTS ¶2 On March 29, 2009, a deputy with the Kenosha county sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66242 - 2011-06-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
explained that a letter showing that the Grant County sheriff’s department had closed its file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60981 - 2014-09-15
explained that a letter showing that the Grant County sheriff’s department had closed its file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60981 - 2014-09-15