Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4321 - 4330 of 6415 for wide.

[PDF] WI APP 97
or hearings during criminal proceedings, the exact nature of those procedures varies widely. In federal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99340 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Richard G. Scullion and Teresa Scullion v. Wisconsin Power & Light Company
gave. We agree with the Scullions. ¶28 A circuit court has wide discretion in deciding how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14768 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
did not seek in its complaint? Or, in default cases, is our otherwise wide-ranging ability
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176383 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David Eric Williams
performance, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions of counsel which were “outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15198 - 2017-09-21

Linda Griffin v. Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc.
in McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 (1961): [T]he Fourteenth Amendment permits the States a wide scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2437 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
performance, the defendant must point to specific acts or omissions by counsel that are “outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238090 - 2019-03-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
worked as a public highway for 10 years or more is presumed to be 66 feet wide. WIS. STAT. §82.31(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84491 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 22
a determination particularly within the wide discretion of the sentencing judge.”). ¶29 Furthermore, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34839 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
recognized the trial court’s wide latitude in balancing the right to counsel of choice against the needs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33785 - 2008-09-23

State v. Antonio L. Simmons
General deterrence is widely recognized as a proper sentencing factor. See United States v. Barker, 771 F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6541 - 2005-03-31