Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43241 - 43250 of 68326 for did.

[PDF] State v. Timothy J. Johnson
to serve a copy of the report on Johnson, but Johnson moved and did not advise counsel of his new address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11304 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Thomas Ponchik v. Jeffrey Endicott
that the conduct report itself did not support the charge of disrespect, but that evidence supported the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14228 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Patricia Marie Wathen v. Robert W. Moore
that the circuit court did not err in concluding that Wathen had not shown a substantial change in circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5594 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
01/17/2018, through his action … did negligently fail to provide necessary care so as to seriously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669133 - 2023-06-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. The court did not consider any improper factors. Swiecichowski’s sentences did not exceed the maximum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624016 - 2023-02-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the existence of a new factor and, thus, the circuit court did not err when it denied his motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435309 - 2021-10-05

CA Blank Order
court further noted that Burns did not offer any new information with his most recent filing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91386 - 2013-01-06

State v. Patrick C. Webster
exercised its sentencing discretion because it did not first explain its reasons for imposing the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13368 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and Smith did not file a respondent’s brief. We nevertheless conclude that the circuit court order should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798544 - 2024-05-09

Thomas Ponchik v. Jeffrey Endicott
did not support the charge of disrespect, but that evidence supported the charge of disruptive conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14228 - 2005-03-31