Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43241 - 43250 of 67883 for law.
Search results 43241 - 43250 of 67883 for law.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
assistance of counsel is a mixed question of fact and law. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶21, 264 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
assistance of counsel is a mixed question of fact and law. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶21, 264 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
[PDF]
State v. Stanley R. Scott
passes constitutional muster, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11689 - 2017-09-20
passes constitutional muster, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11689 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
or the constitution or laws of this state, that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30817 - 2007-11-07
or the constitution or laws of this state, that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30817 - 2007-11-07
Fred C. Hageny, Jr. v. Edwin A. Schowalter
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Delap v. Institute of America, Inc., 31 Wis.2d 507, 510, 143
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10543 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Delap v. Institute of America, Inc., 31 Wis.2d 507, 510, 143
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10543 - 2005-03-31
State v. Susan J. Seim
was deficient or whether the defense was prejudiced are questions of law that this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12428 - 2005-03-31
was deficient or whether the defense was prejudiced are questions of law that this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12428 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott C. Anderson
mixed questions of law and fact. We will not reverse the trial court’s underlying factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12332 - 2017-09-21
mixed questions of law and fact. We will not reverse the trial court’s underlying factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12332 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph S. Barfoot
assistance of counsel constitutes a mixed question of law and fact. See State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15713 - 2005-03-31
assistance of counsel constitutes a mixed question of law and fact. See State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15713 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robin A. Arnold v. John C. Robbins, Jr.
. Jorgenson of Jorgenson Law Office of Darlington. Respondent ATTORNEYSFor the defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10442 - 2017-09-20
. Jorgenson of Jorgenson Law Office of Darlington. Respondent ATTORNEYSFor the defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10442 - 2017-09-20
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
question of law and fact. Id. at 698. Thus, the trial court’s findings of fact, “the underlying findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12449 - 2005-03-31
question of law and fact. Id. at 698. Thus, the trial court’s findings of fact, “the underlying findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12449 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Lechner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33828 - 2008-08-25
of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Lechner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33828 - 2008-08-25