Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43251 - 43260 of 59359 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 43251 - 43260 of 59359 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. James H. Washington
appeals from a judgment convicting him of armed robbery as a repeat offender. He claims the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3394 - 2005-03-31
appeals from a judgment convicting him of armed robbery as a repeat offender. He claims the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3394 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randy W. Larson
appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Larson claims that his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14184 - 2014-09-15
appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Larson claims that his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14184 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court should not have used the figures presented by Melinda, and claims the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64058 - 2014-09-15
the circuit court should not have used the figures presented by Melinda, and claims the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64058 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Carl A. Estrada v. Wisconsin Department of Correction
and because substantial evidence supports the PRC's decision, we affirm. Estrada first claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8225 - 2017-09-19
and because substantial evidence supports the PRC's decision, we affirm. Estrada first claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8225 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven V. Conlan
claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Princess Cinema of Milwaukee, Inc., 96 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14510 - 2005-03-31
claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Princess Cinema of Milwaukee, Inc., 96 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14510 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” for not having raised the motion’s claims in the earlier postconviction motion. The State’s argument assumes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208068 - 2018-02-02
” for not having raised the motion’s claims in the earlier postconviction motion. The State’s argument assumes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208068 - 2018-02-02
State v. David N. Blackburn
to him even though she claimed to be afraid of him; (5) her diary included reference to at least one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3223 - 2005-03-31
to him even though she claimed to be afraid of him; (5) her diary included reference to at least one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3223 - 2005-03-31
Libbie Pesek v. Lincoln County General Relief Agency
controversy exists. A justiciable controversy is one in which a claim of right is asserted against one who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9130 - 2005-03-31
controversy exists. A justiciable controversy is one in which a claim of right is asserted against one who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9130 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court has explained in its supplemental findings that the bank did not make any claim for judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95624 - 2017-09-21
court has explained in its supplemental findings that the bank did not make any claim for judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95624 - 2017-09-21
State v. Carl F. Hickman
that it was sexual intercourse. ¶4 In addition, to the extent that Hickman’s current claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5076 - 2005-03-31
that it was sexual intercourse. ¶4 In addition, to the extent that Hickman’s current claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5076 - 2005-03-31