Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43251 - 43260 of 69155 for he.
Search results 43251 - 43260 of 69155 for he.
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order denying his second motion to vacate the DNA surcharge imposed when he was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75473 - 2011-12-19
from an order denying his second motion to vacate the DNA surcharge imposed when he was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75473 - 2011-12-19
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joseph F. Paulus
. Attorney Paulus submits that under SCR 22.19(2) he cannot successfully defend himself against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16833 - 2005-03-31
. Attorney Paulus submits that under SCR 22.19(2) he cannot successfully defend himself against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16833 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steven W. Van Liew
noting he does not intend to defend himself and would enter a no-contest plea. Attorney Van Liew
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26102 - 2006-08-01
noting he does not intend to defend himself and would enter a no-contest plea. Attorney Van Liew
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26102 - 2006-08-01
CA Blank Order
that he detected the possible odor of alcohol, that Wunnicke’s eyes were red, that she appeared nervous
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91217 - 2013-01-01
that he detected the possible odor of alcohol, that Wunnicke’s eyes were red, that she appeared nervous
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91217 - 2013-01-01
CA Blank Order
was improper because he committed the crime in Sauk County, where he walked away from the job site. We reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106929 - 2014-01-14
was improper because he committed the crime in Sauk County, where he walked away from the job site. We reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106929 - 2014-01-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
he served on a sentence before it was vacated. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654081 - 2023-05-11
he served on a sentence before it was vacated. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654081 - 2023-05-11
Judi L. Stratil v. David J. Stratil
evaluations.[1] David Stratil appeals from that order. He argues that the trial court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13164 - 2005-03-31
evaluations.[1] David Stratil appeals from that order. He argues that the trial court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13164 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1] motion in which he claimed a violation of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92143 - 2013-01-24
an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1] motion in which he claimed a violation of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92143 - 2013-01-24
State v. Victor Spanbauer
and four controlled-substance violations. He was sentenced to two years in prison on each count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12219 - 2005-03-31
and four controlled-substance violations. He was sentenced to two years in prison on each count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12219 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Freitag’s appellant’s brief is incomprehensible and rambling. He does not properly cite to the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176350 - 2017-09-21
. Freitag’s appellant’s brief is incomprehensible and rambling. He does not properly cite to the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176350 - 2017-09-21