Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43261 - 43270 of 68530 for did.
Search results 43261 - 43270 of 68530 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Reginald Young
of this contention. The trial court ruled that Foucha did not apply and rejected his argument. Young now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7703 - 2017-09-19
of this contention. The trial court ruled that Foucha did not apply and rejected his argument. Young now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7703 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
alleged in the complaint as the factual basis for Hoskins’ pleas, which the court then did. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660291 - 2023-05-23
alleged in the complaint as the factual basis for Hoskins’ pleas, which the court then did. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660291 - 2023-05-23
[PDF]
State v. Brett M. Trenter
” form that was read to him did not contain specific language required by § 343.305(4)(c), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9782 - 2017-09-19
” form that was read to him did not contain specific language required by § 343.305(4)(c), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9782 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Keith A. Rudolph
to follow the State’s recommendation. During his allocution, Rudolph did not propose a different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25673 - 2017-09-21
to follow the State’s recommendation. During his allocution, Rudolph did not propose a different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25673 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
failed to give specific details about why Treml’s driving was erratic, and that the description he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44406 - 2014-09-15
failed to give specific details about why Treml’s driving was erratic, and that the description he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44406 - 2014-09-15
Genevieve Langreck v. Cathy Gorst
, although they did not expressly convey that “silent” permission to the Langrecks. She added that both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15796 - 2005-03-31
, although they did not expressly convey that “silent” permission to the Langrecks. She added that both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15796 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank S. Smith
for her, which he did. Because the officer and a police agent initiated the transaction, Smith presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
for her, which he did. Because the officer and a police agent initiated the transaction, Smith presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lothar W. Penkert
that the prosecutor did not present a sworn complaint and that this violated § 968.01, STATS. However, he does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11972 - 2017-09-21
that the prosecutor did not present a sworn complaint and that this violated § 968.01, STATS. However, he does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11972 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert Stannard
of the plan substantially exceeded the amount contributed by employees. It did not matter, in the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31
of the plan substantially exceeded the amount contributed by employees. It did not matter, in the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the witness had already testified and did not return to the stand. Pederson also argues that error occurred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159234 - 2017-09-21
the witness had already testified and did not return to the stand. Pederson also argues that error occurred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159234 - 2017-09-21