Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43271 - 43280 of 57165 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶33. ¶13 We conclude that Johnson has not demonstrated a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106275 - 2014-01-06

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 25, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
the constitutional standard. Id. ¶7 Mason insists that Kastenschmidt’s entry did not fall within any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33141 - 2008-06-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to be a reasonable strategic choice that does not constitute deficient performance. See id., ¶75 (“Reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994986 - 2025-08-13

COURT OF APPEALS
criteria, the [radar device] readout is presumptively correct and is to be admitted into evidence.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54949 - 2010-09-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable exercise of a bona fide community caretaker function.” Id., ¶30. This function can arise “when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181441 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
party.” Id., ¶14. ¶9 We reject Griffis’s claim that the circuit court’s desire to review the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193980 - 2017-09-21

Joseph P. Sepanek, Jr. v. M & I Bank of Burlington
therefrom other than as agent.” Id. Applying these statutes, we reject Joseph’s claim that Gould had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11238 - 2005-03-31

Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Northern States Power Company
the narrowest possible construction or an unreasonable construction. Id.; Columbia Hosp. Ass'n v. Milwaukee, 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11885 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
committed, was committing, or is about to commit a crime. Id., 2007 WI 60, ¶13, 301 Wis. 2d at 9, 733 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109118 - 2017-09-21

2007 WI APP 128
. Id. at 285. Based partly on Wis. Stat. § 102.51(5), the court refused to allow the disability claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28297 - 2007-04-26