Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43281 - 43290 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 43281 - 43290 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Douglas D.
.”) Similarly, Douglas does not condemn as clearly erroneous the trial court’s implicit finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15718 - 2017-09-21
.”) Similarly, Douglas does not condemn as clearly erroneous the trial court’s implicit finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15718 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at trial and sentencing; we refer to him as the sentencing court. The Honorable Dennis R. Cimpl denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251557 - 2019-12-17
at trial and sentencing; we refer to him as the sentencing court. The Honorable Dennis R. Cimpl denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251557 - 2019-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
, concluding that he had not established at trial that the radar/laser system was taken from his automobile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45732 - 2010-01-13
, concluding that he had not established at trial that the radar/laser system was taken from his automobile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45732 - 2010-01-13
[PDF]
State v. Reginold B. Trussell
. Trussell claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15732 - 2017-09-21
. Trussell claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15732 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
remaining issues for trial were: (1) whether Jerome had made an initial $2,000 payment on the note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103304 - 2013-10-21
remaining issues for trial were: (1) whether Jerome had made an initial $2,000 payment on the note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103304 - 2013-10-21
[PDF]
Richard Wanta v. Frederic C. Mueller
that there are genuine issues of material fact entitling them to a trial on both claims. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4641 - 2017-09-19
that there are genuine issues of material fact entitling them to a trial on both claims. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4641 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of the statute.[5] The motion was granted in part on April 7, 2006. The jury trial commenced June 8, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31680 - 2008-02-05
of the statute.[5] The motion was granted in part on April 7, 2006. The jury trial commenced June 8, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31680 - 2008-02-05
WI App 128 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1637 Complete Title o...
of courts. The complaint on file with the trial court was signed. Menards claims that despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69688 - 2011-09-27
of courts. The complaint on file with the trial court was signed. Menards claims that despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69688 - 2011-09-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the trial court or on later appeal.’” Id., ¶23 (quoted source omitted). “However, the rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101687 - 2017-09-21
in the trial court or on later appeal.’” Id., ¶23 (quoted source omitted). “However, the rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101687 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, he would have attempted to make a counter-offer or gone to trial, but because the subsequent offer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103623 - 2017-09-21
, he would have attempted to make a counter-offer or gone to trial, but because the subsequent offer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103623 - 2017-09-21