Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43291 - 43300 of 84321 for simple case search/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
upon.” The court elicited from Smith that he had proceeded in the federal system in a habeas case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30124 - 2007-08-29

Bridget C. v. Stephen J.C.
” in the case for various reasons; (3) the trial court’s finding of abuse is not supported by the evidence; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14843 - 2005-03-31

State v. Corey Robert Saxby
was not in custody for this case. Although the court affirmed that the trial would remain as scheduled for February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6297 - 2005-03-31

George Burnett v. Dawn Alt
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-3356, 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11738 - 2005-03-31

Clayton Ganser v. Claudia Schwartz
and dismissing Ganser’s complaint. The court later entered a final order in the case which confirmed the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12757 - 2005-03-31

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Neung S.
] Neung was unable to post bail and therefore remained incarcerated during the pendency of her case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2205 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Louis Kapischke v. County of Walworth
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0796 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13771 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). In an August 31, 2020 order, the court placed this case on the expedited appeals calendar, and the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300437 - 2020-10-29

[PDF] State v. Craig R. Nelson
court. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involves Nelson’s sexual assault and attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21048 - 2017-09-21

Express Services, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
are great weight deference, due weight deference, and de novo review. Id. ¶9 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5535 - 2013-02-18