Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4331 - 4340 of 69366 for as he.
Search results 4331 - 4340 of 69366 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Daniel E. Creviston
obtained as a result of what he claims was his unlawful arrest for possessing open intoxicants, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15533 - 2017-09-21
obtained as a result of what he claims was his unlawful arrest for possessing open intoxicants, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15533 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel E. Creviston
evidence obtained as a result of what he claims was his unlawful arrest for possessing open intoxicants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15533 - 2005-03-31
evidence obtained as a result of what he claims was his unlawful arrest for possessing open intoxicants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15533 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suppressed drug evidence because, he claims, police unlawfully searched his shoes during a field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87110 - 2014-09-15
suppressed drug evidence because, he claims, police unlawfully searched his shoes during a field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87110 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Fond du Lac v. Kevin C. Derksen
of his theory and, upon doing so, affirm the judgments. ¶2 Derksen’s theory is as follows: He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4184 - 2017-09-19
of his theory and, upon doing so, affirm the judgments. ¶2 Derksen’s theory is as follows: He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4184 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Fond du Lac v. Kevin C. Derksen
of his theory and, upon doing so, affirm the judgments. ¶2 Derksen’s theory is as follows: He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4183 - 2017-09-19
of his theory and, upon doing so, affirm the judgments. ¶2 Derksen’s theory is as follows: He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4183 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven C. Hinzmann
that he unlawfully refused to submit to a chemical test in violation of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(9). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31
that he unlawfully refused to submit to a chemical test in violation of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(9). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of obstructing an officer.[1] Watters argues he should be permitted to withdraw his no contest plea because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50756 - 2010-06-07
of obstructing an officer.[1] Watters argues he should be permitted to withdraw his no contest plea because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50756 - 2010-06-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
was based on an allegation of obstructing an officer.1 Watters argues he should be permitted to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50756 - 2014-09-15
was based on an allegation of obstructing an officer.1 Watters argues he should be permitted to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50756 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that he forced entry into Kerry K.’s ground floor apartment through a screened window and sexually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69575 - 2011-08-15
that he forced entry into Kerry K.’s ground floor apartment through a screened window and sexually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69575 - 2011-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond to the report, but he has not done so. After considering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112693 - 2017-09-21
to respond to the report, but he has not done so. After considering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112693 - 2017-09-21