Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4331 - 4340 of 68290 for did.
Search results 4331 - 4340 of 68290 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
consecutive to any other sentence. The defense was free to argue for a lesser sentence. ¶5 Shaw did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72887 - 2015-02-03
consecutive to any other sentence. The defense was free to argue for a lesser sentence. ¶5 Shaw did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72887 - 2015-02-03
[PDF]
State v. William H. Roberts
the plea on the grounds that he never admitted his repeater status at the time of the plea nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4088 - 2017-09-20
the plea on the grounds that he never admitted his repeater status at the time of the plea nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4088 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI App 25
was “coming from the direction the citizen witness reported” and that he did not observe “any other red
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929199 - 2025-05-19
was “coming from the direction the citizen witness reported” and that he did not observe “any other red
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929199 - 2025-05-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for the obstructing. Gregory did not appeal under WIS. STAT. § 974.02(1) and WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30. ¶3 On June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30041 - 2014-09-15
for the obstructing. Gregory did not appeal under WIS. STAT. § 974.02(1) and WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30. ¶3 On June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30041 - 2014-09-15
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
it discovered in determining a sentence but counsel did not interrupt to object. Whether a defendant
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=1091&year=2019
it discovered in determining a sentence but counsel did not interrupt to object. Whether a defendant
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=1091&year=2019
Leanne Gladis Hanson v. Travelers Insurance Company
it was error to refuse to give those instructions, because their absence did not prejudice Hanson. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9977 - 2005-03-31
it was error to refuse to give those instructions, because their absence did not prejudice Hanson. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9977 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Disposition table - January 2019
Richard A. Mueller v. TL90108, LLC Dallet, J. did not participate. 01/15/2019 PETITIONS
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234155 - 2019-02-01
Richard A. Mueller v. TL90108, LLC Dallet, J. did not participate. 01/15/2019 PETITIONS
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234155 - 2019-02-01
[PDF]
State v. Maurice D. Harris
that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how additional investigation would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5764 - 2017-09-19
that counsel did not adequately investigate, Harris has not explained how additional investigation would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5764 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Timothy S. Headrick
the trial court did not make specific findings of fact, this court must assume that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3210 - 2017-09-19
the trial court did not make specific findings of fact, this court must assume that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3210 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Town Board of Montrose v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin
County ordinance because construction did not begin within one year of initial approval of the CUP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5763 - 2017-09-19
County ordinance because construction did not begin within one year of initial approval of the CUP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5763 - 2017-09-19