Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4331 - 4340 of 55654 for n c.

[PDF] Frontsheet
. For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Michael C. Sanders, assistant attorney general, with whom
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189070 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Law Day Kit 2001
Phone: 715/732-7470 Atty. Kent Hoffman State Public Defender’s Office 101 N. Ogden Road, Suite C
/courts/resources/teacher/docs/lawday01.pdf - 2001-02-07

[PDF] WI APP 43
-cross-respondents, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Elizabeth C. Stephens of Cranfill Sumner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=828330 - 2024-09-11

2008 WI APP 98
and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 LUNDSTEN J. The question before us is whether Wis. Stat. § 66.0217(11)(c) bars
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32747 - 2008-06-24

[PDF] WI APP 98
. § 66.0217(11)(c) bars a town from contesting in court a particular type of annexation, namely, a direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32747 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 24
Hoffer Properties, LLC v. State of Wisconsin 01/12/2015 2013AP907 Kenneth C. Burgraff, Sr. v. Menard
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137116 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Disposition Table January & February 2015
Hoffer Properties, LLC v. State of Wisconsin 01/12/2015 2013AP907 Kenneth C. Burgraff, Sr. v. Menard
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137116 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Daniel J. Wideman
. § 346.65(2)(c), the OWI penalty enhancer. 3 The circuit court denied the defendant’s motion to vacate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16999 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
the Special Assessment District. See § 66.0703(5)(c), (d). Concerning the two parcels owned by Emjay
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64259 - 2011-05-16

[PDF] WI APP 36
SOFTWARE, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, MICHAEL C. HALL AND KEVIN C. AUSTIN, DEFENDANTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78323 - 2014-09-15