Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43301 - 43310 of 83505 for case search.
Search results 43301 - 43310 of 83505 for case search.
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in two burglary cases that were jointly handled in the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102890 - 2013-10-08
postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in two burglary cases that were jointly handled in the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102890 - 2013-10-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Townsend filed an action in small claims court seeking money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919421 - 2025-02-25
case. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Townsend filed an action in small claims court seeking money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919421 - 2025-02-25
Carol Robson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
the jury’s verdict, but the trial court denied the motion and dismissed the case. ¶3 On appeal, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15324 - 2005-03-31
the jury’s verdict, but the trial court denied the motion and dismissed the case. ¶3 On appeal, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15324 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Marshall Orris v. Nathan F. Brand
., PLAINTIFF, V. NATHAN F. BRAND, FREDERIC E. MOHS, SUZANNE H. CASE & RICHARD M
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14010 - 2014-09-15
., PLAINTIFF, V. NATHAN F. BRAND, FREDERIC E. MOHS, SUZANNE H. CASE & RICHARD M
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14010 - 2014-09-15
Robin K. v. Lamanda M.
as the proper standard in guardianship proceedings, as opposed to the Barstad standard. However, the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7392 - 2005-03-31
as the proper standard in guardianship proceedings, as opposed to the Barstad standard. However, the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7392 - 2005-03-31
Village of Tigerton v. Donald Minniecheske
perjury during the original proceedings. Minniescheske may not reopen the case by simply relitigating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13474 - 2005-03-31
perjury during the original proceedings. Minniescheske may not reopen the case by simply relitigating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13474 - 2005-03-31
Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. James E. Doyle
(2001-02), this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its review
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1252 - 2003-06-01
(2001-02), this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its review
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1252 - 2003-06-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=867993 - 2024-10-31
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=867993 - 2024-10-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on identical footing and no two cases will present identical factors. See State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77323 - 2014-09-15
on identical footing and no two cases will present identical factors. See State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77323 - 2014-09-15
Office of State Public Defender v. Circuit Court For Walworth County
BROWN, P.J. The question in this case is whether Wis. Stat. § 48.23(4) (1997-98),[1] which deals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15792 - 2005-03-31
BROWN, P.J. The question in this case is whether Wis. Stat. § 48.23(4) (1997-98),[1] which deals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15792 - 2005-03-31