Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43301 - 43310 of 44722 for part.

COURT OF APPEALS
of, that strategy. This question is informed in large part by the presumption that counsel’s strategic decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118785 - 2014-07-30

Frontsheet
of facts but chose, presumably at least in part, to simplify the proceeding and reduce the ultimate costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107501 - 2014-01-28

[PDF] State v. Tremell Jackson
the plea; and coercion on the part of trial counsel.” Shimek, 230 Wis. 2d at 739. Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6730 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Robert M. Madsen
the relevant facts were discovered independently by the police as part of their investigation into Lisa’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5398 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Christina Malik v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of her 1 WISCONSIN STAT. § 174.02 provides in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2540 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
was accurately restated here at trial. · whether the statement or any part of it ought to be believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30118 - 2007-08-29

State v. Daniel J. Eagan
of unfair prejudice.[3] Lessmiller, a state trooper who was part of an honor guard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7745 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
agreement contract as part of a prima facie case for summary judgment.” WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT, TABLE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58403 - 2014-09-15

State v. Robert J. Stynes
for increased penalties for repeat offenders and provides in relevant part: 939.62 Increased penalty
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16620 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. George Smith
, 1178–1179 (Colo. Ct. App. 1984), rev'd in part on other grounds, 724 P.2d 1329 (Colo. 1986) (en banc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8233 - 2017-09-19