Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43321 - 43330 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 43321 - 43330 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP231 3 A bench trial was held. At the start of the trial, Nelson Lumber dismissed its claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676562 - 2023-07-06
. No. 2021AP231 3 A bench trial was held. At the start of the trial, Nelson Lumber dismissed its claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676562 - 2023-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
were set for grounds-phase trials. The trial date was adjourned at E.F.’s request to conduct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075438 - 2026-02-06
were set for grounds-phase trials. The trial date was adjourned at E.F.’s request to conduct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075438 - 2026-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
—effectively, a trial to the court—commenced on November 30, 2009. The circuit court concluded that Streeter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76273 - 2014-09-15
—effectively, a trial to the court—commenced on November 30, 2009. The circuit court concluded that Streeter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76273 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, Jones phrases his two main issues as whether “the trial court violate[d] Bangert and create[d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116663 - 2014-07-14
, Jones phrases his two main issues as whether “the trial court violate[d] Bangert and create[d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116663 - 2014-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
of the statute.[5] The motion was granted in part on April 7, 2006. The jury trial commenced June 8, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31680 - 2008-02-05
of the statute.[5] The motion was granted in part on April 7, 2006. The jury trial commenced June 8, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31680 - 2008-02-05
Dolores J. Rindahl v. Ralph G. Rindahl
these factors in reaching its decision, we are to search the record for facts to support the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10709 - 2005-03-31
these factors in reaching its decision, we are to search the record for facts to support the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10709 - 2005-03-31
WI App 128 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1637 Complete Title o...
of courts. The complaint on file with the trial court was signed. Menards claims that despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69688 - 2011-09-27
of courts. The complaint on file with the trial court was signed. Menards claims that despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69688 - 2011-09-27
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
during the trial or in his original appeal. ¶5 Mikrut now appeals that decision. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6205 - 2005-03-31
during the trial or in his original appeal. ¶5 Mikrut now appeals that decision. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6205 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, concluding that he had not established at trial that the radar/laser system was taken from his automobile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45732 - 2010-01-13
, concluding that he had not established at trial that the radar/laser system was taken from his automobile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45732 - 2010-01-13