Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43371 - 43380 of 64716 for b's.

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Candice P.
Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, STATS. 2017-09-19T22:46:59-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10021 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90648 - 2012-12-17

COURT OF APPEALS
] By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion shall not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101932 - 2013-09-23

State v. Gerold A. Haut
in Wis. Stat. § 939.44(1)(b) as “something which the defendant reasonably believes the intended victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5046 - 2005-03-31

State v. Phillip M. Ross
809.23(1)(b)5. [1] Ross raises an additional alternative argument asking us to remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18694 - 2005-06-27

State v. Anthony Mitchell
.—Judgment and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2646 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] Nitchals was actually held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59565 - 2011-01-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027802 - 2025-10-23

State v. Richard Stoeckel
] By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5694 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
filings by Griswold. A court may issue sanctions under WIS. STAT. § 802.05(3)(b) in the form
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115301 - 2017-09-21