Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43371 - 43380 of 68326 for did.
Search results 43371 - 43380 of 68326 for did.
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
that the State did not sufficiently prove the repeat offender penalty enhancements relating to his misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11446 - 2005-03-31
that the State did not sufficiently prove the repeat offender penalty enhancements relating to his misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11446 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank S. Smith
for her, which he did. Because the officer and a police agent initiated the transaction, Smith presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
for her, which he did. Because the officer and a police agent initiated the transaction, Smith presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the hearing discussing it, found that Patricia Kay Novotny was not in contempt of court because she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90023 - 2012-12-04
the hearing discussing it, found that Patricia Kay Novotny was not in contempt of court because she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90023 - 2012-12-04
State v. Richard Boho
that did not involve threats made to the victim is not a violation of the court-imposed “no contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11611 - 2005-03-31
that did not involve threats made to the victim is not a violation of the court-imposed “no contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11611 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
testified that he was aware of the article from a staffing reviewing new research. Broeders did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108794 - 2014-03-11
testified that he was aware of the article from a staffing reviewing new research. Broeders did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108794 - 2014-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
not include criminal activity,” the call did not amount to reasonable suspicion without some corroboration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88591 - 2012-10-22
not include criminal activity,” the call did not amount to reasonable suspicion without some corroboration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88591 - 2012-10-22
City of Madison v. Duke M. Jawara
for a blood test, which yielded a result of 0.14 g/100 ml. ¶4 Jawara did not contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3689 - 2005-03-31
for a blood test, which yielded a result of 0.14 g/100 ml. ¶4 Jawara did not contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3689 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rubin E. Ards
. At his jury trial, Dotson did not appear. To identify Ards as the attacker, the State instead relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25870 - 2006-07-12
. At his jury trial, Dotson did not appear. To identify Ards as the attacker, the State instead relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25870 - 2006-07-12
[PDF]
Raymond Ludwikowski v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
did not adequately address the possibility that Ludwikowski could perform work under the restrictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9421 - 2017-09-19
did not adequately address the possibility that Ludwikowski could perform work under the restrictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9421 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the exceptions to the mootness doctrine apply. Notably, Alquist did not file a reply brief addressing mootness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699983 - 2023-09-06
of the exceptions to the mootness doctrine apply. Notably, Alquist did not file a reply brief addressing mootness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699983 - 2023-09-06