Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43371 - 43380 of 68466 for did.
Search results 43371 - 43380 of 68466 for did.
State v. Robert Stannard
of the plan substantially exceeded the amount contributed by employees. It did not matter, in the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31
of the plan substantially exceeded the amount contributed by employees. It did not matter, in the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
did not receive notice of the proceedings. We agree. We therefore reverse and remand for the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50570 - 2010-06-01
did not receive notice of the proceedings. We agree. We therefore reverse and remand for the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50570 - 2010-06-01
State v. Peter R. Burgeson
. The trial court did not state whether the sentence was to be served concurrent with, or consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court did not state whether the sentence was to be served concurrent with, or consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
Michelle Frank v. James Fritz
that there were no genuine issues of material fact and that they did not know or have reason to know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12375 - 2005-03-31
that there were no genuine issues of material fact and that they did not know or have reason to know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12375 - 2005-03-31
Gail M. Washington v. Melvin K. Washington
be true that the result is unfair to Gail, we conclude that the circuit court did not have authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13956 - 2005-03-31
be true that the result is unfair to Gail, we conclude that the circuit court did not have authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13956 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 22, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
did not describe the facts in sufficient detail. Therefore, he has waived this argument. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28526 - 2007-03-21
did not describe the facts in sufficient detail. Therefore, he has waived this argument. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28526 - 2007-03-21
State v. Mario F. Blasnig
ruled that such did not constitute a new factor. This court agrees. A sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10262 - 2005-03-31
ruled that such did not constitute a new factor. This court agrees. A sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10262 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn Schulpius
: Not Participating: PROSSER, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the petitioner-appellant the cause
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16350 - 2005-03-31
: Not Participating: PROSSER, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the petitioner-appellant the cause
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16350 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerome M. Wywial
of his operating privileges, did not constitute multiple punishments, and did not violate the Double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10813 - 2005-03-31
of his operating privileges, did not constitute multiple punishments, and did not violate the Double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10813 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
practice. Id. Here, the record reflects that the circuit court did conduct an on-the-record colloquy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558449 - 2022-08-23
practice. Id. Here, the record reflects that the circuit court did conduct an on-the-record colloquy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558449 - 2022-08-23