Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43391 - 43400 of 45956 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the scene of the robbery. Those bullet casings were later tested at the Wisconsin State Crime Laboratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260107 - 2020-05-12

Order-SC
the strength of the old. ¶34 In adopting the "clearly stronger" test, this court quoted from Gray v. Greer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118156 - 2015-01-20

[PDF] NOTICE
consider Otis’s claim that the arrest information constituted newly discovered evidence. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30340 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for relief has been stated.” Green Spring Farms, 136 Wis. 2d at 315. “In testing the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243436 - 2019-07-16

State v. Frank S., Jr.
tendency” test. See State v. Denny, 120 Wis. 2d 614, 622-25, 357 N.W.2d 12 (Ct. App. 1984); see also State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18027 - 2005-05-04

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
Christensen v. Schwartz, 198 Wis. 222, 223, 222 N.W. 231, 231 (1928). “The test by which to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15829 - 2005-03-31

State v. Daniel J. Konshak
and that it prejudiced the defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). The test for measuring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8202 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
tendency’” test to be applied when a defendant seeks to introduce third-party defense evidence. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108920 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Frank S., Jr.
the “legitimate tendency” test. See State v. Denny, 120 Wis. 2d 614, 622-25, 357 N.W.2d 12 (Ct. App. 1984); see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18027 - 2017-09-21

Dean Deback v. James E. White, M.D.
would have been more favorable to appellants but for the improper conduct. See id. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10699 - 2005-03-31