Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4341 - 4350 of 63708 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 4341 - 4350 of 63708 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Eugene G.
, supports his position that this case requires a reversal and his release from custody. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31
, supports his position that this case requires a reversal and his release from custody. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronnie P.
: Motion to adjourn trial — Ronnie remained in custody. The court granted Attorney Mullison’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15143 - 2017-09-21
: Motion to adjourn trial — Ronnie remained in custody. The court granted Attorney Mullison’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15143 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Temporary Physical Custody Request.2 The petition and request were based on concerns that the parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936466 - 2025-04-03
Temporary Physical Custody Request.2 The petition and request were based on concerns that the parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936466 - 2025-04-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 55. 1 On this court’s own motion this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074689 - 2026-02-10
. 55. 1 On this court’s own motion this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074689 - 2026-02-10
2010 WI APP 17
, 233 Wis. 2d at 525, 608 N.W.2d at 372–373. The Bruflats were divorced and had joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44861 - 2010-01-26
, 233 Wis. 2d at 525, 608 N.W.2d at 372–373. The Bruflats were divorced and had joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44861 - 2010-01-26
State v. Robert D. Hanson
a motion contending that the State’s filing of the victim impact statement violated its promise to cap its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15001 - 2005-03-31
a motion contending that the State’s filing of the victim impact statement violated its promise to cap its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15001 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert D. Hanson
the “maximum sentence allowed.” In response, Hanson filed a motion contending that the State’s filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15001 - 2017-09-21
the “maximum sentence allowed.” In response, Hanson filed a motion contending that the State’s filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15001 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-Figueroa’s motion does not establish that he was in custody at the time he made the inconsistent statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103739 - 2017-09-21
-Figueroa’s motion does not establish that he was in custody at the time he made the inconsistent statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103739 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence because the nine months imposed exceeded a potential joint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220312 - 2018-10-02
sentence because the nine months imposed exceeded a potential joint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220312 - 2018-10-02
COURT OF APPEALS
and Ronald Frank Kuka: Beth Ann Lovern, Joint-Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald Frank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56326 - 2010-11-03
and Ronald Frank Kuka: Beth Ann Lovern, Joint-Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald Frank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56326 - 2010-11-03