Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4341 - 4350 of 58303 for speedy trial.
Search results 4341 - 4350 of 58303 for speedy trial.
State v. Dante Boston
an order denying his post‑conviction motion. Boston claims that the trial court erred in not holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9392 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his post‑conviction motion. Boston claims that the trial court erred in not holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9392 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Robert A. Settecase appeals from a trial court order upholding a jury verdict in favor of his former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739255 - 2023-12-12
. Robert A. Settecase appeals from a trial court order upholding a jury verdict in favor of his former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739255 - 2023-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Dante Boston
-conviction motion. Boston claims that the trial court erred in not holding a Miranda-Goodchild hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9392 - 2017-09-19
-conviction motion. Boston claims that the trial court erred in not holding a Miranda-Goodchild hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9392 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Edward Frank Finn v. Debra M. Finn
in maintenance for an indefinite term. She argues that the trial court misused its No. 99-0285-FT 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15081 - 2017-09-21
in maintenance for an indefinite term. She argues that the trial court misused its No. 99-0285-FT 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15081 - 2017-09-21
Edward Frank Finn v. Debra M. Finn
for an indefinite term. She argues that the trial court misused its discretion when it relied on her historic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15081 - 2005-03-31
for an indefinite term. She argues that the trial court misused its discretion when it relied on her historic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15081 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a prison sentence with the length left to the trial court’s discretion. The trial court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201619 - 2017-11-07
a prison sentence with the length left to the trial court’s discretion. The trial court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201619 - 2017-11-07
[PDF]
State v. Izell W.
. § 948.02(1), and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-adjudication and post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7028 - 2017-09-20
. § 948.02(1), and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-adjudication and post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7028 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
, and Young was free to argue for a lesser sentence. The trial court accepted Young’s plea and found him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106473 - 2014-01-07
, and Young was free to argue for a lesser sentence. The trial court accepted Young’s plea and found him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106473 - 2014-01-07
State v. Billye L. Massey
” convictions), and from a postconviction order summarily denying his motions for a new trial for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25064 - 2006-05-08
” convictions), and from a postconviction order summarily denying his motions for a new trial for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25064 - 2006-05-08
State v. Thomas Deffke
to § 948.40(1), Stats. Deffke claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31
to § 948.40(1), Stats. Deffke claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31