Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43401 - 43410 of 68517 for did.
Search results 43401 - 43410 of 68517 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence, which did not exceed the legal maximum. We note that the presentence investigation (PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988820 - 2025-07-29
sentence, which did not exceed the legal maximum. We note that the presentence investigation (PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988820 - 2025-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(citation omitted). ¶4 Fluker’s trial counsel did, in fact, object to the admission of the preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677335 - 2023-07-11
(citation omitted). ¶4 Fluker’s trial counsel did, in fact, object to the admission of the preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677335 - 2023-07-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that it did not need to reach the issue of indigency in light of Dahlk’s failure to demonstrate an arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195278 - 2017-09-21
that it did not need to reach the issue of indigency in light of Dahlk’s failure to demonstrate an arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195278 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Reginald Young
of this contention. The trial court ruled that Foucha did not apply and rejected his argument. Young now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7703 - 2017-09-19
of this contention. The trial court ruled that Foucha did not apply and rejected his argument. Young now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7703 - 2017-09-19
State v. Andrew J. Hawe
only pertains to test results conducted under the implied consent law. Since he did not consent, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7573 - 2005-03-31
only pertains to test results conducted under the implied consent law. Since he did not consent, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7573 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that Orengo argues we should accept the court’s finding that his attorney did not have a strategic reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35444 - 2014-09-15
that Orengo argues we should accept the court’s finding that his attorney did not have a strategic reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35444 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Estella Marie Iddings
, such conflicts did not render her testimony incredible as a matter of law. It was for the jury to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11451 - 2017-09-19
, such conflicts did not render her testimony incredible as a matter of law. It was for the jury to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11451 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
alleged in the complaint as the factual basis for Hoskins’ pleas, which the court then did. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660291 - 2023-05-23
alleged in the complaint as the factual basis for Hoskins’ pleas, which the court then did. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660291 - 2023-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that it was not substantial because the children did not ask about him or discuss his absence. The court also acknowledged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147097 - 2017-09-21
that it was not substantial because the children did not ask about him or discuss his absence. The court also acknowledged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147097 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brett M. Trenter
” form that was read to him did not contain specific language required by § 343.305(4)(c), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9782 - 2017-09-19
” form that was read to him did not contain specific language required by § 343.305(4)(c), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9782 - 2017-09-19