Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43401 - 43410 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 43401 - 43410 of 74812 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, on the grounds that the claims are procedurally barred. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995609 - 2025-08-12
, on the grounds that the claims are procedurally barred. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995609 - 2025-08-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634803 - 2023-03-21
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634803 - 2023-03-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, to which Hobach filed a response. Upon review of the memoranda, supplemental letters, and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92656 - 2013-02-12
, to which Hobach filed a response. Upon review of the memoranda, supplemental letters, and the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92656 - 2013-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Wis. Stat. § 108.04(5) (“Discharge For Misconduct”). ¶8 According to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139398 - 2015-04-08
. See Wis. Stat. § 108.04(5) (“Discharge For Misconduct”). ¶8 According to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139398 - 2015-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that he pled as charged because his former counsel told him his record “didn’t look too bad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91837 - 2013-01-22
testified that he pled as charged because his former counsel told him his record “didn’t look too bad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91837 - 2013-01-22
State v. Darnell C. Stevens
. Ct. App. June 27, 1995). We concluded: Based on an independent review of the record, we find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24740 - 2006-04-10
. Ct. App. June 27, 1995). We concluded: Based on an independent review of the record, we find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24740 - 2006-04-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
twenty days. From the record, it does not appear Gustafson made such arrangements. In August 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310400 - 2020-12-08
twenty days. From the record, it does not appear Gustafson made such arrangements. In August 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310400 - 2020-12-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
threw another that hit Thomas. Joseph denied asking Charles to record a video of the incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208393 - 2018-02-13
threw another that hit Thomas. Joseph denied asking Charles to record a video of the incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208393 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
the messages to police, who responded and made a digital recording of the answering machine messages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56806 - 2014-09-15
the messages to police, who responded and made a digital recording of the answering machine messages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56806 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony the court heard at the hearing and “for the reasons on the record” expressed at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737200 - 2023-12-06
testimony the court heard at the hearing and “for the reasons on the record” expressed at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737200 - 2023-12-06