Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43401 - 43410 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
counsel. Following a preliminary hearing, the circuit court bound Rogstad over for trial. Rogstad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144424 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
remaining issues for trial were: (1) whether Jerome had made an initial $2,000 payment on the note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103304 - 2013-10-21

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
during the trial or in his original appeal. ¶5 Mikrut now appeals that decision. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6217 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 20, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
the desire to have a trial, or belated misgivings about the plea.” Id., ¶32 (citations omitted). We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62841 - 2012-01-08

State v. Jeremiah C.
was June 26, 2002. Katie contested the petition; after a court trial on April 15, 2002, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5426 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Gregg Hagopian v. Lawrence Lind
. The Linds argue that the trial court erred in determining that the claims the Hagopians alleged were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14881 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Gary A. Michels
appeals from the trial court’s order forfeiting his rights to his 1957 Triumph automobile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4672 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
an unreasonable seizure. The trial court denied the motion, No. 2008AP2927 3 concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36845 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the petition in September 2021. B.M. acknowledged that she had experienced a full TPR trial and disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of those charges at the time of this trial, and (2) the other-acts evidence was unfairly prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209255 - 2018-03-07